Home  »  IRAC  »  Meeting Minutes  »  September 15, 2004

RAC Meeting Minutes (September 15, 2004)

Quarterly Meeting

Introductions
Welcome to Heather Hicks Quesenberry as the new FSIS RAC technical representative to the RAC.

Agency Updates:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Donald Sharp Department of Defense U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (CHPPM)
Brandolyn Thran EPA Office of Water (OW)
Stephen Schaub FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN)
Dick Whiting
Marianne Miliotis
David Carlson FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM)
Mary Bartholomew - No updates FDA National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR)
Angelo Turturro Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
Wesley Long USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Jim Lindsay

Project with National Alliance for Food Safety: extension of NFPA (National Food Processors Association) study on L. monocytogenes; ~approx. 1 year study to begin October 1, 2004 with focus on delis. This study, which was developed by and is being supported by both FSIS and ARS, will include sampling and analysis of RTE packaged foods and those sliced in the deli in California, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Tennessee. The objective of this study is to quantify the levels of L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) processed meat and poultry products sliced in retail supermarket delis compared to levels in RTE processed meat and poultry products sliced and packaged at a USDA or state inspected meat and poultry processing plant. These data will be used to: Estimate actual consumer exposure to L. monocytogenes from RTE processed meat and poultry products. and to conduct a risk assessment of L.monocytogenes in RTE processed meat and poultry products to support science-based strategies for addressing the occurrence of L.monocytogenes in these foods in the U.S.

Andy Hwang USDA Cooperative State Research Education, and Extension Service (CSREES)
Mary Torrence Margaret Venuto USDA Food Safety and Inspection Services (FSIS)
Heather Hicks Quesenberry Janell Kause Presentations
  1. "Tissue Culture and Dose Response" by Marianne Miliotis
  2. "Folic Acid Fortification: Making the Decisions" by Jean Rader, FDA/CFSAN.
Policy Council Meeting

The policy council representatives reviewed the progress of the RAC towards FY04 annual plan goals, and approved proposed FY05 goals.

RAC-sponsored Symposium

"Data Collection and Utilization in Risk Assessments and Management Decisions" held on September 14, 2004 at the College Park Aviation Museum.

Presentations

December 2003 RAC Quarterly Meeting
Carol Maczka, USDA/FSIS, RAC policy council co-chair, gave a presentation on "The USDA Food Safety Risk Assessment Committee."

John Painter, CDC gave a presentation on "Allocating the burden of Foodborne illness by food commodity- the role of outbreak reports"

April 2004 RAC Quarterly Meeting
CDC representatives made four presentations: June 2004 RAC Quarterly Meeting
"Economic Incentives for Food Safety Innovation: Case Studies in the U.S. Meat Industry" by Tanya Roberts, USDA/ERS.

September 2004 RAC Quarterly Meeting
"Folic Acid Fortification: Making the Decisions" by Jeanne Rader, FDA/CFSAN

Work Group Updates
  1. Data Gaps Analysis

    The Data Gaps workgroup sent an announcement to FSNET to publicize that "Data Gaps for Selected Microbial Risk Assessments," is available on the RAC website. The purpose of this announcement is to invite food safety researchers and risk assessors to rank the data gaps to identify research priority.

  2. Dose-Response
    1. The DRWG continues their seminar series. Marianne Miliotis will present on "Tissue Culture and Dose Response" from 11AM-12 at the Interagency Risk Assessment Consortium Quarterly Meeting, Sept. 15th.

    2. The DRWG was asked to provide input toward a newly developing proposed metric of microbial infectivity for the EPA. Audrey Ichida of ICF consulting Inc., and Walt Jakubowski joined the phone conversation to facilitate the discussion. An initial reaction to their approach was provided to give guidance to the development of this metric.
  3. Peer Review

    During this quarter, the Peer Review work group (PRWG) held two meetings (phone conference on June 23rd and a face-to-face meeting in College Park, MD on August 25th) to discuss further revisions to the manuscript: "Peer Review of Food Safety Risk Assessments." Further revisions included incorporating EPA's information on cost of a peer review based on the approach used and its rigor; refining the tables ranking the different kinds of peer review (e.g., panel, intra-agency, inter-agency, expert panels, NAS review, etc.) based on five criteria: 1) transparency; 2) rigor; 3) objectivity; 4)independence; and 5) resources. The discussion paper currently contains most of its content and is being revised by the work group this month. The PRWG planned to consider the finalized OMB bulletin on peer review in finalizing its draft manuscript. The Office of Management and Budget, however, indicated that the recently revised (April 15, 2004) draft OMB peer review bulletin has not been finalized based on public comments. Moreover, OMB does not have a date set for the release of a finalized OMB peer review bulletin. In the meantime, the PRWG has solicited input from the RAC policy council on the depth, content and utility of the peer review manuscript. Based on these comments, the PRWG will revise the manuscript in the first quarter of FY2005 with planned work group meetings in October and November 2004."

  4. Data Information and Quality

    Questionnaire was sent out to all the RAC member agencies to assess current practices for ensuring data quality in risk assessments. Results of questionnaire are pending based on responses received.

  5. Risk-Risk

    The risk-risk workgroup previously decided to invite representatives from member agencies to speak at RAC meetings. This will hopefully allow us to (a) learn about important risk-risk issues that member agencies have previously dealt with, and, (b) ask the speakers how the risk-risk workgroup can help their agencies and whether there are specific needs or questions the agencies have regarding risk-risk issues. Today we heard from the first speaker in our series, Jeanne Rader, Ph.D., from FDA/CFSAN. Dr. Rader talked about the FDA decision to promote fortification of cereal products with folic acid. We heard that folic acid fortification can help prevent neural tube birth defects by increasing folic acid intake in pregnant women and women of childbearing years. Fortification is not without risks, however, as B vitamin deficiencies are possible in at risk populations, including genetically disposed individuals and the elderly. In essence, risk may be shifted from one population to another and a decision was made that enhanced health due to folic acid fortification outweighed potential alternative risk tradeoffs due to either folic acid or vitamin B deficient diets. Potential speakers for upcoming RAC meetings have been identified and the workgroup is still working on expanding the list of potential speakers.

  6. Data Utility

    The Data Utility Work Group organized the symposium on "Data Collection and Utilization in Risk Assessments and Management Decisions" to be held on 14 September 04 at the College Park Aviation Museum. Approximately 50 people attended the half-day symposium. It is the Work Group's hope that this symposium is the first in a series dealing with Data Utility issues.
Gary Banks, EPA, proposed to the RAC Policy Council on the possibility of the RAC working towards developing interagency guidelines for microbial risk assessment.

RAC Annual Plan FY05
  1. Continue from FY04:
    1. Presentations
      1. Continue presentations by agency representatives on current risk assessments.
      2. Continue presentations by member agencies on issues related to risk assessment.

    2. Work Group Projects
      1. Dose-Response on mechanistic dose-response data Continue dialog with NIH, CSREES and other RAC linked researchers, as well as NMRC to obtain more information. Continue dose-response seminar series.

        Develop a manuscript to incorporate additional mechanistic data into DR to better describe variability in host, pathogen and environment. Tentatively, manuscript would address difficulties with current dose-response approach of risk assessment and identify specific examples from previous risk assessments of how a more mechanistic approach to dose-response could better facilitate risk analysis. Example pathogens could then be used to demonstrate how dose-response data could be improved using published or unpublished data. Such organisms may include

        B. anthracis, Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, Helicobacter, or Salmonella. DRWG agreed that as an initial approach, the group would identify how Campylobacter animal dose-response data could help to assist the development of a human Campylobacter dose-response relationship. Additionally, the group is interested in using Cryptosporidium as a model organism to demonstrate how more mechanistic data are needed to develop more representative dose-response relationships.

      2. Data Gaps Analysis
        Continue to update/expand the Data Gaps Analysis worksheet as data gaps are filled and new gaps are identified. Rank the data gaps (prioritize the "specific need"). Specify pertinent elements, e.g., products, parameters and ranges, to be investigated in research that addresses specific data gaps.

      3. Data Quality Guidelines
        Plan to continue work on a more far-reaching document (of which the earlier five pager will provide a good introduction) to discuss issues in data quality, including methods to ensure quality, potential drawbacks, lessons learned, etc. This document will be based on the response to the questionnaires provided to the member agencies on their data quality practices.

      4. Peer Review
        Revise and complete discussion paper on regulatory peer review of risk assessments based on the comments of the RAC Policy Council members. Once completed and cleared by the RAC Policy Council members, the PRWG plans to publish the manuscript and post an executive summary on the RAC Clearinghouse web site. The PRWG is also discussing the possibility of holding a joint symposium with the Data Utility and/or Data Quality work group(s).

      5. Risk-Risk
        Develop a concept/discussion paper based on presentations by representatives from member agencies to speak at upcoming RAC meetings. This will hopefully allow us to (a) learn about important risk-risk issues that member agencies have previously dealt with, and, (b) determine how the risk-risk workgroup can help their agencies and whether there are specific needs or questions the agencies have regarding risk-risk issues.

      6. Data Utility
        Consider a second workshop with the focus on statistical sampling. Possibly develop a discussion paper on useful sampling strategies based on the two meetings to serve as a reference for member agencies.

      7. An additional project for FY05 was proposed by the RAC Policy Council: "Risk-based approach to establishing microbiological criteria"

In attendance (* participated by 'phone):

  Gary Banks, EPA
*Mary Bartholomew, FDA/CVM
  Robert Buchanan, FDA/CFSAN
  David Carlson, FDA/CFSAN
*Sharon Edelson Mammel, FDA/CFSAN
  Neal Golden, USDA/FSIS
  Heather Hicks Quesenberry, USDA/FSIS
  Andy Hwang, USDA/ARS/ERRC
  Abdel Kadry, USDA/FSIS
  Janell Kause, USDA/FSIS
*Jim Lindsay, USDA/ARS
*Wes Long, FDA/CFSAN
  Marianne Miliotis, FDA/CFSAN
  Judy Nelson, EPA/OPPTS
  Stephen Schaub, EPA/OW
*Don Sharp, CDC
  Brandolyn Thran, DOD/US CHPPM
  Mary Torrence, USDA/CSREES
  Angelo Turturro, FDA/NCTR
*Margaret Venuto, USDA/CSREES
  Richard Whiting, FDA/CFSAN
Print-friendly version