Home  »  IRAC  »  Meeting Minutes  »  June 22, 2005

RAC Meeting Minutes (June 22, 2005)

Agency Updates:

Department of Defense Veterinary Services Agency (VSA) and U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (CHPPM)

Bradford Hildabrand

Brandolyn Thran

 The focus will be on common "problems areas" that are potentially confusing, misapplied and misinterpreted (e.g., hazard quotients, biological vs. statistical significance, identification of appropriate receptors). 

FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN)
Dick Whiting

Marianne Miliotis

FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM)
Mary Bartholomew

USDA Food Safety and Inspection Services (FSIS)
Janell Kause

Presentation

Robyn Lee, DOD/CHPPMpresented on “Sampling designs, their uses, and how they were/are used by USACHPPM”

Work Group Updates

The Microbiological Criteria Work Group has conducted frequent telephone conferences and drafted a working paper describing the protocol for establishing microbiological criteria.  The working paper is undergoing a final round of review and revisions.  It should be ready within a few weeks for review by the different agencies. 

A summary of the protocol taken from the working paper is:

The Microbiological criterion is a set of values that are used to determine whether a specific lot of food is acceptable or not.  These values include: the microbial test protocol and its sensitivity, the confidence that an unacceptable lot will be detected, the number of samples to be taken and the number of positive samples that are allowed before rejecting the lot.  Determining the microbiological criteria begins with an understanding of the distribution of contamination within a lot, particularly within a lot that just meets the acceptable level of the microbial hazard.  This can be decided from a decision on the FSO or PO and on the small fraction of samples that can exceed these values.  This information will define the ‘just acceptable lot.’  With this information, a microbial test protocol is chosen to have a sensitivity level appropriate for the contamination distribution.  A confidence level for the MC and the c value are also chosen.  With this information the number of samples required can be calculated.   

The Peer Review Work Group has been updating, harmonizing, and finalizing the content of their paper on the peer review of food safety risk assessments, particularly to reflect OMB's Final Bulletin on Peer Review.  Some work group members are beginning the process of clearing the paper through their respective agencies.

The Data Gaps Analysis Work Group has updated its data gaps list

The following data gaps have been added:
-Listeria monocytogenes in Smoked Finfish
-Listeria monocytogenes in Fresh-Cut Vegetables
-Listeria monocytogenes in Soft Unripened Cheese
-Salmonella spp. in raw Beef and Poultry
-Salmonella Enteritidis in Shell Eggs and Salmonella spp. in Egg Products.
-Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium botulinum in Ready-to-Eat and Partially Cooked Meat and Poultry Products.
-Hepatitis A Virus: Relationship of Virus Infection Associated with Handling and Consumption of Produce.
-Norovirus: Elucidation of the Mode of Transmission.

The updated list is posted on the RAC website.

The Data Gap work group would like to thank Sherri Dennis, John Hicks, Janell Kause, Carl Schroeder, and Neal Golden for providing the data gaps.

The Data Utility Work Group has submitted a proposal to the SRA for a symposium titled: “The Status of Data Utility in Health Risk Assessment and Decision Making: A Multi-disciplinary Review” for the SRA Annual Meeting in December this year.  In the event it is not selected, the work group will use what was developed for an "independent" symposium later in the year.”

The Data and Information Quality Work Group has no update to report at this time.

Risk Ranking Symposium

The symposium is advertised on the FoodRisk.org, and a draft agenda has been developed. 

The Steering committee has had telephone conferences with both the speakers and the panel members. 

In attendance (* participated by ‘phone):

*Mary Bartholomew, FDA/CVM
*Kerry Dearfield, USDA/FSIS
John Hicks, FDA/CFSAN
Bradford Hildabrand, DOD/VMS
*Andy Hwang, USDA/ARS/ERRS
*Janell Kause, USDA/FSIS
Robyn Lee, USACHPPM
Marianne Miliotis, FDA/CFSAN
*Jacqueline McQueen, EPA/ORD
*Carl Schroeder, USDA/FSIS
Brandolyn Thran, DOD/CHPPM
Mark Walderhaug, FDA/CFSAN
Richard Whiting, FDA/CFSAN

 

Print-friendly version